Subscribe

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Shane van Gisbergen's Supercars title hopes hit by race one penalty

Shane van Gisbergen has been hit with a 25-second penalty for yesterday's Supercars race, giving Scott McLaughlin a clear advantage going into Sunday's title decider

Van Gisbergen won the penultimate race of the season in dramatic fashion, pipping McLaughlin just two corners from the chequered flag to move just two points shy of the Penske driver with one race to go.

However the result was swiftly thrown into doubt when officials investigated an alleged pitstop breach, TV footage having shown van Gisbergen's car being lowered off its jacks before refuelling was complete on his third and final stop.

The Deputy Race Director later recommended a penalty, although the final decision was deferred until Sunday morning as Triple Eight Race Engineering argued its case.

According to the stewards' report, Triple Eight's argument was based on the incident not yielding a performance advantage, being a result of miscommunication between pit crew, and therefore not worthy of a penalty.

But that argument was unsuccessful, stewards confirming this morning that van Gisbergen has been slapped with a 25s penalty - the equivalent of a drive-through penalty - and dropped to fifth in the race result.

"The DRD submitted that a pitlane penalty is the appropriate penalty for a breach of Rule D25.6.3.2," read the report.

"He submitted that, while the driver of car #97 could not be said to have contributed to the breach, car #97 gained or stood to gain a sporting advantage by reason that it could take on more fuel within its elapsed pitstop time by keeping the coupling connected while the car was lowered.

"For that reason, and despite the infringement prejudicing the safety of team personnel, a team penalty is inappropriate.

"The respondent submitted that no sporting advantage was gained in this case, that any infringement was the result of miscommunication between team personnel and was unintended. He submitted that if any penalty is to be imposed, it should be a team penalty only.

"While we accept that the infringement was the result of a mistake and that no sporting advantage was intended, we agree with the DRD that by permitting the coupling to remain connected while a car is lowered allows the car to take on more fuel than it otherwise could.

"The volume of fuel in this case may have been small but the outcome of the race demonstrates the potential for fine tolerances in full volumes to affect the results.

"Even though several occurred some time in the past, we have had regard to the penalties applied to breaches of this rule previously.

"Save for two breaches where the circumstances were not comparable, a breach of the rule has consistently resulted in a pitlane penalty being applied."

The penalty gives McLaughlin the clear upper hand in the title fight, a 53-point advantage meaning he only needs to finish sixth or better in the finale to claim a maiden crown.

Be part of the Autosport community

Join the conversation
Previous article Investigation threatens van Gisbergen's crucial Supercars win
Next article Supercars Newcastle: Penske's McLaughlin seals the title in finale

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe