Click to view our fantastic subscription offers

Instant access to the F1 paddock

You have 10 views remaining

You have read 5 stories this month. After 15, you will need to register or subscribe.

Register with us for free to view 25 stories a month.

Or subscribe to AUTOSPORT+ for unlimited news stories and access to our exclusive subscriber-only content.

Our commitment to quality journalism

We've introduced metered access to AUTOSPORT which will ensure that the majority of our visitors can continue to view the site for free. But we think that is worth a small investment from those who use it most, so that we can continue to send the leading experts in their field to motor racing paddocks all over the world to break the latest news and produce the most compelling interviews and race reports.

Every visitor gets 15 free page views per month. Once you reach the limit you can register to get 25 views or choose one of our value-for-money subscription packages to continue viewing and to get additional access to a range of features including:

  • Unlimited access to AUTOSPORT with news and views from the paddock
  • Enjoy AUTOSPORT+: subscriber-only analysis, comment and top-quality pictures
  • Get AUTOSPORT magazine in a digital format on your computer or iPad every week
  • Full access to FORIX - the world's best motorsport statistics website

We greatly appreciate your continued support to keep AUTOSPORT at the forefront of motorsport coverage, and we look forward to welcoming you as a new subscriber.

Glenn Freeman Editor
Find out more about our subscriptions
You are on the classic version of Autosport. Visit to see our new site.

Mercedes unhappy FIA named Allison, Sassi in Ferrari F1 ERS case

Toto Wolff Mercedes Monaco Grand Prix 2018

Toto Wolff has expressed his frustration at the FIA for revealing Mercedes Formula 1 technical director James Allison and engine man Lorenzo Sassi helped prompt an investigation into Ferrari's ERS.

The issue is sensitive for Mercedes in part because both Allison and Sassi are ex-Ferrari staff members, with Sassi having worked at Maranello until last July.

Wolff believes the governing body should not be as specific as to name individuals and should only suggest which team has made enquires about the legality of a rival's car.

The story behind the Ferrari ERS scandal

Reports emerged confirming Allison and Sassi had enquired about Ferrari's ERS after race director Charlie Whiting spoke to journalists in Monaco.

Wolff subsequently met with Whiting, who pointed out that he had only acknowledged the names put to him by the media.

Asked if he felt that the Mercedes pair had been "thrown under a bus" by the FIA, Wolff said: "Yes. One of my roles is to protect my people, and if certain individuals are named in a wrong context, that is disturbing.

"The most important thing is to understand how the process goes and various teams question the FIA every single day.

"I think it's just important to not put somebody out there and say, 'This person has questioned a legality topic'.

"If you say that a team has done that, it's perfectly fine, that is modus operandi. But picking out individuals, and putting them out there is, I think, not the right thing to do."

Whiting said the names had already been in the media and that he had simply confirmed them when asked by journalists.

"I had a chat with Toto, I didn't think it was any secret," he said.

"When we had a little chat with the [media] guys [on Saturday] it was they who came up with the Ferrari man's name [Sassi]."

He stressed that it was not unusual for teams to come to the FIA with questions about rivals.

"It was just one of those normal conversations you have with somebody," added Whiting.

"'We think Ferrari may be doing this and this because of that,' and we went and checked. We thought they could be doing that, let's have a check and make sure. It took us a little while to get to that.

"It's a pretty routine thing for people to come to us, especially when they've had staff members come from another team.

"Don't forget, Lorenzo's information is at least eight months old, which in F1 terms is quite old."

  More news  
Read the AUTOSPORT Digital Edition
See highlights from 60 years of AUTOSPORT
Breaking news feed
Live commentary feed